Why Standard Metrics Mislead
A game producing strong coin-in but sitting in a high-cost zone, carrying heavy Free Play attribution, and requiring frequent service calls may be generating far less net value than a quieter bank three rows away. Gross win per unit and even theoretical win per unit mask these dynamics. The floor rankings you are making capital decisions around may not reflect the asset value you think they do.
The JSA Triple-Net Model
Our proprietary calculation deducts all relevant costs and allocated marketing spend from each game's gross contribution to produce a true net figure — comparable across every unit on the floor regardless of denomination, location, or game type. The result is a ranked view of your floor that often looks meaningfully different from your current internal rankings.
That difference is where your optimization opportunity lives.
What the Analysis Produces
- Game-level triple-net profitability ranking across your entire floor
- Identification of underperforming assets consuming floor space that higher-performing games could occupy
- Denomination and game-type mix analysis calibrated to your patron base and competitive set
- Conversion and replacement prioritization with cost-benefit rationale for each recommended change
- Zone-level performance analysis to evaluate layout efficiency and traffic flow economics
Who This Is For
Slot directors and GMs making capital purchase decisions, evaluating new game placements, or preparing for a floor reset. Also valuable for CFOs benchmarking asset productivity across a multi-property portfolio, or management consultants conducting operational reviews where slot floor efficiency is a component of the engagement.